|
Sources
Our software
has been built based on best practices from leaders in the field of Higher Education. Below are some
of the important sources:
Measuring Student Success
 |
Peter Ewell --
The Accountability Scene for Community Colleges: New
Challenges, New Measures -
Presentation at NCCBP forum
Note slide 18 which shows
Milestone Events in a Student Enrollment Pathway -- All of the rates
there are great measurements of success, but can be very
difficult to obtain. ZogoTech developed a
general-purpose engine for generating these with
a few clicks. It allows time-series analysis
with arbitrary starting and ending events.
i.e. so you can determine how long it takes for
students to graduate once they have achieved X
credits or how long it takes them to pass
through the developmental sequence once they
have passed their first class. For
more applications, see the
Completion Point Reporting
Engine
|
|
|
 |
Washington State Board for Community and
Technical Colleges Student Achievement Initiative
This is a fascinating way to quantify
student progress / momentum. Points are
assigned to each student based on how far they
have moved through the pathway. In this
case it is used for performance-based state
funding, but it could also be used in an
individual institution to monitor progress in a
more fine-grained manner (rather than just
looking at graduation rates). It allows
institutions to focus on gaps between the
various stages / momentum points.
Email from Tina Bloomer,
Director, Student Achievement Project:
We keep information
about the Student Achievement Initiative at:
http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/college/e_studentachievement.aspx
We have a one page
document that describes momentum points at: http://www.sbctc.ctc.edu/college/education/momentum_point_calculation_mar07.pdf
While we identified
the actual points we are using for this
initiative and decided to call them momentum
points, the concept of momentum actually comes
from Cliff Adelman, a veteran researcher
formerly of the U.S. Department of Education,
who developed the concept of the academic
momentum perspective based on the Department of
Education staff review of the national databases
|
|
|
 |
The Maryland Model of Community College Student
Degree Progress
Maryland Community
College Accountabiity Work Team (2006). Contact
Craig Clagett, Carroll Community College,
cclagett@carrollcc.edu
The Maryland
Model
proposes a more accurate model for measuring
student success in a community college.
Carroll
Community College provides the following
example: their Federal Student Right to Know
(SRK) 3 year graduation rate is about 18%,
but filtering out students by intent, using
a longer time period, and broadening the
definition of success to be more appropriate
for community colleges, the rate of
"success" can be as high as 70-80%
There are
several interesting things the model does:
-
The
model looks at the student's behavior
after the fact to measure intent. If
the student did not attempt 18 hours
during the first 2 years of study, then
Maryland Model take the position that
the student was not "degree-seeking" and
those students are not counted
(debatable, but perhaps a reasonable
assumption)
-
The
model looks at a 4 year time period
instead of 3 years
-
The
model considers transfer as success
-
The
model considers 30 hours credit with a
2.0 GPA as success (even if the student
does not get a degree)
|
|
|
 |

The Impact of Postsecondary Remediation Using a Regression
Discontinuity Approach: Addressing Endogenous Sorting and Noncompliance (An
NCPR Working Paper)
By: Juan Carlos Calcagno and Bridget Terry
Long (April 2008)
This paper looks at the performance of students just above and below the
state cutoff test score for remediation (i.e. students who just barely
tested out of remediation vs. those who just barely missed testing out of
remediation). It finds that remediation did not give any additional
benefit for those students just below the cutoff, but it did slow them down
by a semester.
One of our Achieving the Dream schools applied the same approach in their
analysis of students completing gatekeeper
courses. They created learning communities for students who scored
just below the cutoff score for college-level math. Students took both
developmental math and college-level algebra in the same semester.
Completion rates were similar to students not in learning communities and
the students passed a major gatekeeper to graduation.
An overview of the NCPR paper can be found on
Inside
Higher Ed
|
|
|
|

|
Peter Ewell --
Working over Time: The Evolution of Longitudinal
Student Tracking Data Bases
Student tracking: New techniques, new
demands. New Directions for Institutional Research
#87
Written in 1994, this article shows a
variety of measurements for tracking
It is based in part on the
work done as part of the LONESTAR project with
David Preston, Brazosport College. The
types of analysis and research presented here
are still applicable today (and most data
warehouses still can't do them)
|
|
Visualizing Data |
|
 |
Edward Tufte
Tufte is a genius at displaying complex,
multivariate data
Visual Display of Quantitative Information
Envisioning Information
Visual Explanations: Images, Quantities,
Evidence and Narrative
|
|
Early Alert |
|
 |
Early Alert
Estudias uses indicators developed by
Noel-Levitz and others to identify students who
are at-risk before the semester starts.
| This includes
indicators such as: Student has
significantly increased his / her course
load, Student is retaking a class,
Student is remedial in more than one
area, Student's GPA has been decreasing
over the past 3 terms.
When most schools talk about Early
Alert, they are talking about
intervening in the middle of the
semester. However has these
indicators, they are at-risk as soon as
the semester starts. |
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|